Consumer services across seven engines
Between 8 and 12 July 2026, seven assistants with live web search answered 105 prompts about 84 Portuguese consumer-service brands in seven sectors, 2,205 answers in all. A brand counts as recommended when it is presented as a suitable option in at least two of three runs, across at least three distinct prompts. The brands are anonymised by sector.
THE RESULT
54.8% of the brands are recommended by zero or one of the seven engines. The average brand is recommended by 1.77.
WHAT STOOD OUT
- Only 2 of the 84 brands are recommended by all seven engines.
- Perplexity recommends the most brands (32 of 84) and DeepSeek the fewest (11).
- 74 of the 149 recommendations (49.7%) come with a citation that supports them.
- 0 engines26 · 31%
- 1 engine20 · 24%
- 2 engines14 · 17%
- 3 engines9 · 11%
- 4 engines7 · 8%
- 5 engines4 · 5%
- 6 engines2 · 2%
- 7 engines2 · 2%
2,205 ANSWERS · JULY 2026
The methodology is not a promise. It is published.
Raw CSV. Redo the math.
One row per brand and engine, 588 rows, with the brands anonymised by sector: mentions, recommendations and citations, their rates, the average position and the sentiment. It reproduces every aggregate in the study.
LICENCE · CC BY 4.0consistencia-visibilidade-ia-servicos-portugal-2026.csvDownload
OTHER STUDIES
- The 2026 Brazilian electionAI predicts that Flávio Bolsonaro wins, and tells voters to choose Lula
- Football in PortugalAI gives the league to Porto and takes its answers from betting sites
- Politics as a reference groupThe same method on a topic anyone can independently verify
- A map of the companies of PortugalWho assistants name when asked about companies in the market
- Strong on Google, invisible in AI251 B2B companies, their Google strength against their presence in AI answers
- AI visibility of Portuguese B2B SaaS45 companies, how ready their sites are and whether four engines recommend them